Joan Kennedy Taylor and the Rediscovery of Libertarian Feminism - Jeff Riggenbach - Mises Media(Audio File)
essence of her message on feminism is that it springs from individuality, because women are just as individual as men the equality of rights must apply to them - those who wish women to vote like a herd of cows by using some buzzwords like 'abortion!' or 'daycare!' are actually insulting their intelligence and the sum total of their interest in the public life
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Geithner warns of future bailouts
Geithner warns of future bailouts
a case of "don't say we didn't warn you" - here is what I think is important, turning a profit! if you borrow from the people but you are able to turn a profit and make them whole, THAT is not a big problem for the people, trust me on this one, you'll get some mumbling and grumbling and that's about it - the economically erroneous perceptions that the people, fed by hysterical media, can sometimes hold as gospel truths must be gently and firmly dispelled with the facts (there was a time when americans had a high degree of capitalist common sense which has been quite tragically lost through public education)
a case of "don't say we didn't warn you" - here is what I think is important, turning a profit! if you borrow from the people but you are able to turn a profit and make them whole, THAT is not a big problem for the people, trust me on this one, you'll get some mumbling and grumbling and that's about it - the economically erroneous perceptions that the people, fed by hysterical media, can sometimes hold as gospel truths must be gently and firmly dispelled with the facts (there was a time when americans had a high degree of capitalist common sense which has been quite tragically lost through public education)
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Grain prices soar after USDA cuts crops outlook
Grain prices soar after USDA cuts crops outlook
calling all farmers! let's grow food, people, the state is about to unleash hunger to push war... fight back, people, and feed yourselves! and check on your neighbors if you can, don't let people around you go hungry
calling all farmers! let's grow food, people, the state is about to unleash hunger to push war... fight back, people, and feed yourselves! and check on your neighbors if you can, don't let people around you go hungry
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
How is "empire" consistent with "liberty"? are you completely nuts?!
the big question facing American civilization is the one answered rather poorly by the great English civilization, are we going to make the same blunders or, are we going to get it right this time, that is the question - the way how the "empire of liberty" works is people join our union of their own free will because they see the superior benefits of the liberal way - where people are oppressed by states our duty is to open our doors, and for people of goodwill everywhere to open their doors and defend the rights of humans to desert their state, doesn't the UN recognize the human right to move about the earth and change nationality?
Pan-Africans for example are determined to offer a right of repatriation to the oppressed blacks of India, which I deeply appreciate, of course, but this is broader and covers any oppressed person anywhere - we must ask China to let Liu Xiabao and his family leave if they so desire, this is the moral stand consistent with Liberty, we must keep our doors open for Liu Xiabao, Dr. Binayak, whoever it is tomorrow, indeed our orgs should correspond with them accordingly
if the people wish to join the American union and are being prevented by state coercion and violence, THEN we have a just cause to use force in their defense, then it is indeed a liberatory exercise because the will of the proto-american people to join the union is served, no imperial transfer of wealth results, no prolonged occupation of the land by the liberating army is needed - another state is added to the Union, simple!
under the consummately elegant federalism gifted by the founding fathers, all of the civilizations of the world would gravitate to the liberal way, driven by the common human desire for prosperity and peace, while retaining all of the uniqueness of their spiritual and cultural heritage consistent with liberal humanism - if you look into it you will find that no civilization presents a contradiction to liberal humanism, none, only imperial ideologies and tithing ecclesiasties do! isn't that the whole point established by King Solomon? isn't that why he is today a worldwide synonym for wisdom? what had caused King David's armed uprising in the first place?
Pan-Africans for example are determined to offer a right of repatriation to the oppressed blacks of India, which I deeply appreciate, of course, but this is broader and covers any oppressed person anywhere - we must ask China to let Liu Xiabao and his family leave if they so desire, this is the moral stand consistent with Liberty, we must keep our doors open for Liu Xiabao, Dr. Binayak, whoever it is tomorrow, indeed our orgs should correspond with them accordingly
if the people wish to join the American union and are being prevented by state coercion and violence, THEN we have a just cause to use force in their defense, then it is indeed a liberatory exercise because the will of the proto-american people to join the union is served, no imperial transfer of wealth results, no prolonged occupation of the land by the liberating army is needed - another state is added to the Union, simple!
under the consummately elegant federalism gifted by the founding fathers, all of the civilizations of the world would gravitate to the liberal way, driven by the common human desire for prosperity and peace, while retaining all of the uniqueness of their spiritual and cultural heritage consistent with liberal humanism - if you look into it you will find that no civilization presents a contradiction to liberal humanism, none, only imperial ideologies and tithing ecclesiasties do! isn't that the whole point established by King Solomon? isn't that why he is today a worldwide synonym for wisdom? what had caused King David's armed uprising in the first place?
Monday, January 10, 2011
Friday, January 7, 2011
Is the "empire of Liberty" in safe hands? tea party strikes terror in the 'professionals'
"We expect politicians to exaggerate, distort and mislead when they are campaigning.... But once they get in office, we should expect them to remember the difference between politicking and reality" - oh, really? who is "we", Nutting? I expect, and indeed DEMAND quite the opposite from politicians, what shit hole do you have your head stuck in? you sound like a typical, demoralized apologist for imperial status quo - it is good to know one's own constitution, and it is even better to understand it in comparative relation to other nations of the world
it is the whole nuomenal assumption that the real meaning or 'intent' of the constitution can only be rendered through a lens of expertise not present in the voters themselves, i.e. the words may be interpreted with both hermeneutic freedom and contemporary prejudices! the explicitly opposite view to the one held by Jefferson and Madison, who intended for the constitution to be the 'common sense' of the country, understood by all citizens, as also to restrain government from crossing the boundary described (by Jefferson) as "the consent of the governed" - one has to be incredibly obtuse or operating from undisclosed motives to deny the minarchic essence of the constitution, its' zealous protection of individual liberties, especially from state infringement, made explicit in reserving ALL powers to the people not expressly granted to government
the implication here is that the 'tea party' right wing (loosely libertarian, but certainly not "conservative" as Nutting assumes) is professing a phony ideology for the purpose of winning votes, and what they really 'mean' is at least deceitful, if not nefarious - so this editorializing effort is to defend the accumulation of statism under "provide for... the general welfare", and to deny the people the right to tell their government what THEY see in the constitution, to tell their government what THEY mean by "provide for... the general welfare", to decide what constitutes a "necessary" condition for legislation, and what makes it "proper" as relating to the constitutional whole
as a point of clarity, the preamble refers to "provide for common defense, and promote the general welfare", so the distinction between "provide" and "promote" may not be glossed, whereas in article 1.8 regarding the power to impose taxes, levies, excise, etc. the word "provide" is used for both "defense" and "welfare" (d-uh! obviously) - like I said, one has to stretch way out into bewildering realms of un-americanity to construe this constitution as the presumptive platform for a welfare-warfare imperial machine! it is a GROSS misunderstanding, and the American people are not having it any more, simple
NO one can make me believe that the impoverishment of black people from a rising 4% of GDP share to less than a falling 0.1% of GDP share is a case of "effectively promote the general welfare"! or, that it was "necessary", or that it was "proper" - people like Nutting have to realize that their beloved government programs like Medicaid and Social Security mean nothing to 21st century people, who want freedom, opportunity, wealth, growth, in short capitalism! they have seen through the "progressive" propaganda and now realize it is the same statist 'friends and family' plan as ever, great if you happen to be "in", and really sucky if you're out
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)